本賽事評分採用0-100分制，評審團將結合聲樂、器樂、原創音樂等不同音樂品類的藝術特性，從專業技術、創意表達、作品完整性、選材與匹配度四個維度綜合考量，確保評審的專業性與公平性。具體評分細則如下：

一、評分細則 / Scoring Criteria

（一）專業技術（40%）

核心考察參賽者對對應音樂品類基礎技術的掌握與運用能力，分品類別具體評估維度如下：

1. 聲樂類（含古典、流行、民族聲樂於一體）：音準節奏（音高準確性、節奏穩定性，無跑調、搶拍、拖拍及節奏紊亂現象）；發聲技巧（氣息控制均勻穩定、共鳴腔體運用合理、音色統一純淨，無破音、氣息虛浮、聲音顫抖等問題）；咬字吐字（發音清晰標準、咬字圓潤飽滿，歌詞傳遞易懂，契合歌曲語言風格）；情感適配（發聲技巧與歌曲情感基調匹配，通過氣息、音色調控強化情感表達）。

2. 器樂類（含古典、現代、民族器樂於一體，含獨奏、重奏）：指法/演奏技法規範性（符合曲目技術要求，指法、弓法、吹奏法等動作標準，無多餘或錯誤技法動作）；音準節奏（音高精准、節奏平穩，無錯音、漏音、搶拍、拖拍及節奏脫節情況）；樂器控制技巧（針對不同樂器特性精准把控，如鋼琴觸鍵的輕重層次與多樣性、弦樂運弓的平穩性與力度控制、管樂氣息的綿長與音色調控，能通過技法變化豐富音色層次）；技巧熟練度（技術難點的完成品質，演奏流暢無卡頓、無技術變形，快速段落清晰規整）。

3. 音樂原創類（含原創聲樂、原創器樂及創意音樂展示）：技法創新性（原創演奏技法、發聲方式或編曲手法的可行性與表現力，兼具專業性與獨特性）；技術完成度（原創內容的呈現精度，演奏或演唱無明顯技術失誤，技法運用服務於作品表達）；創意落地能力（將音樂創意構思轉化為實際表演的實現效果，技術與創意融合自然）。

4. 集體音樂類（合唱、器樂合奏、聲樂器樂協奏）：聲部配合（聲部平衡協調，無某一聲部蓋過其他聲部的情況，和聲精准和諧）；節奏同步（全體成員節奏統一，無快慢不一、銜接斷層問題）；音色融合（聲樂合唱音色統一、器樂合奏音色適配，整體音效和諧飽滿）。

（二）創意與表達（30%）

聚焦參賽者通過音樂表演傳遞作品主題思想與個人風格的能力，分品類別具體評估維度如下：

1. 通用維度：主題詮釋（對作品創作背景、情感基調和核心內涵的理解深度，表演與主題契合度高）；演繹獨特性（在尊重原作的基礎上，融入個人風格的個性化呈現，如聲樂的情感遞進設計、器樂的樂句處理方式，避免機械複刻原作）；情感傳遞（通過演奏或演唱傳遞真實且貼合作品的情感，以樂音引發觀眾共鳴）。

2. 聲樂類：演唱風格個性化（在原作框架內實現情感表達創新、音色處理特色化，或對流行、民族等風格的精准把控與個性演繹）；情感與旋律融合度（通過歌聲強弱起伏、音色變化，精准傳遞歌曲情感，實現聲線與旋律的無縫契合）；編曲適配（若對原作編曲進行改編，改編部分與聲樂演繹適配，不違和且增強作品表現力）。

3. 器樂類：樂感表達（對曲目情感的感知與傳遞能力，通過音色起伏、節奏張弛、強弱對比展現作品情感層次）；演繹風格創新（在尊重原作的基礎上，對樂句、速度、強弱對比的創意處理，賦予作品獨特韻味）；樂器表現力（最大化發揮樂器音色特質，通過技法調控展現作品豐富內涵）。

4. 音樂原創類：創意獨特性（作品核心創意的新穎度，旋律、和聲、編曲設計區別於傳統音樂表達，具有辨識度）；主題與創意融合度（創意表達與核心主題契合，無創意與主題脫節、技法堆砌無意義的情況）；風格統一性（作品整體風格統一，段落過渡自然，創意貫穿始終）。

（三）作品完整性（20%）

衡量參賽作品整體呈現效果與細節把控品質，分品類別具體評估維度如下：

1. 通用維度：細節豐滿度（對作品細節的把控精度，如聲樂的氣口處理、器樂的裝飾音演繹、樂句收尾的完整性，避免表演粗糙、流於表面）；整體協調性（表演速度、力度、風格等元素統一適配，各段落之間過渡自然，無明顯邏輯斷層）；完成度（表演過程無明顯中斷、失誤堆積或遺漏段落等情況，完整展示作品核心魅力，收尾乾淨俐落）。

2. 集體音樂類：團隊協同完整性（成員間配合默契，聲部銜接流暢、節奏同步，無音色衝突、節奏錯位、聲音脫節等情況，整體呈現連貫統一）；整體表現力（團隊整體對作品的詮釋一致性，情感傳遞同步，共同烘托作品氛圍）。

3. 音樂原創類：創意完整性（原創內容從開篇到收尾邏輯閉環，無創意斷層、結構殘缺或未完成感）；結構完整性（作品曲式結構合理，主歌、副歌、間奏等段落搭配協調，整體篇幅適配表演需求）。

（四）選材與匹配度（10%）

關注參賽作品與參賽者個人能力、年齡特點、品類風格的契合度，具體評估維度如下：

1. 難度適配性：依據參賽者年齡、學習年限及技術水準選擇難度適宜的作品，低年齡段避免過度追求高難度技巧導致表演變形、失誤頻發，高年齡段需突破簡單重複作品，選擇能展現技術進階與樂感的曲目。

2. 特長發揮：選材能否精准展現參賽者個人優勢，如音色清亮者適配民歌、氣息綿長著適配抒情聲樂、技巧嫺熟者適配高難度器樂作品，實現“以作品揚特長”的效果。

3. 品類適配性：作品風格與所選音樂品類特性適配，無風格與品類脫節情況（如古典器樂品類選擇古典曲目更適配，流行聲樂品類選擇流行風格更適配，民族音樂品類選擇貼合民族特色的曲目更適配）。

二、評審機制 / Judging Mechanism

1. 雙重獨立評分

每件參賽作品由2位對應音樂領域的專業評審分別獨立打分，取平均分作為最終成績，最大限度減少主觀偏差，保障評分公平性。若兩位評審打分差值超過10分，將啟動第三方評審復核，取三位評審打分的平均分作為最終成績。

2. 權威評審團構成

評審團涵蓋青少年音樂教育協會資深顧問、專業音樂院校聲樂、器樂、作曲等對應學科教師、知名兒童音樂教育機構教研負責人及音樂領域資深從業者（如知名演奏家、音樂製作人、聲樂導師等）。評審團兼具扎實的音樂學術理論功底與豐富的青少年音樂教育實踐經驗，既以專業標準評判技術能力，也尊重青少年兒童表演的童真與個性，精准挖掘每位參賽者的音樂閃光點。
 

Judging Criteria

This competition employs a 0-100 point scoring system. The judging panel will comprehensively evaluate entries across four dimensions—technical proficiency, creative expression, overall coherence, and material selection/matching—tailored to the artistic characteristics of different musical categories such as vocal music, instrumental music, and original music, ensuring professional and impartial adjudication. Specific scoring criteria are as follows:

I. Scoring Criteria

(1) Technical Proficiency (40%)

This assesses the contestant's mastery and application of fundamental techniques specific to their musical category. Evaluation dimensions vary by category as follows:

1. Vocal Music (including classical, pop, and ethnic vocal music):Pitch and Rhythm (accurate intonation, steady rhythm, no off-key, rushing, dragging, or rhythmic irregularities); Vocal Technique (uniform and stable breath control, reasonable use of resonance cavities, pure and unified timbre, no broken notes, weak breath, or voice trembling); Articulation (clear and standard pronunciation, mellow and full diction, intelligible lyric delivery that fits the language style of the song); Emotional Adaptation (vocal techniques match the emotional tone of the song, enhancing emotional expression through breath and timbre control).

2. Instrumental Music (including classical, modern, and ethnic instrumental music, solo and ensemble):Finger/Playing Technique Standardization (meets the technical requirements of the piece, standard fingerings, bowing, and blowing techniques, no unnecessary or incorrect movements); Pitch and Rhythm (accurate pitch, steady rhythm, no wrong notes, missing notes, rushing, dragging, or rhythmic disconnection); Instrument Control Skills (precision in mastering instrument-specific characteristics, such as the depth and diversity of piano touch, the smoothness and strength control of string bowing, the continuity and timbre regulation of wind instrument breath, and the ability to enrich timbre layers through technical changes); Technical Proficiency (quality execution of technical challenges, fluent performance without hesitation or distorted techniques, and clear and neat fast passages).

3. Original Music (including original vocal music, original instrumental music, and creative music displays):Innovation in Technique (feasibility and expressiveness of original performance techniques, vocal methods, or arrangement techniques, combining professionalism and uniqueness); Technical Execution (precision in presenting original content, no obvious technical errors in performance, and techniques serving the expression of the work); Creative Implementation (effectiveness in translating musical creative concepts into actual performances, with natural integration of techniques and creativity).

4. Group Music (choir, instrumental ensemble, vocal-instrumental collaboration):Voice Part Coordination (balanced and harmonious voice parts, no single part overpowering others, and accurate and harmonious harmonies); Rhythmic Synchronization (unified rhythm among all members, no inconsistent speed or disjointed transitions); Timbre Fusion (unified timbre in vocal choirs, adaptive timbre in instrumental ensembles, and harmonious and full overall sound effect).

(II) Creativity and Expression (30%)

Focuses on the contestant's ability to convey the thematic ideas and personal style of their work through musical performance. Specific evaluation dimensions by category are as follows:

1. Universal Criteria:Theme Interpretation (depth of understanding regarding the work's creative background, emotional tone, and core essence, with a high degree of alignment between performance and theme); Interpretive Uniqueness (personalized presentation incorporating individual style while respecting the original work, such as emotional progression design in vocal music and phrasing handling in instrumental music, avoiding mechanical reproduction); Emotional Conveyance (transmitting true emotions that fit the work through performance, resonating with the audience through music).

2. Vocal Music:Personalized Singing Style (innovative emotional expression and distinctive timbre treatment within the framework of the original work, or accurate grasp and personalized interpretation of pop, ethnic and other styles); Harmony of Emotion and Melody (accurately conveying song emotions through changes in vocal dynamics and timbre, achieving seamless integration of voice and melody); Arrangement Adaptation (if the original arrangement is adapted, the adapted part is compatible with vocal performance, enhancing the work's expressiveness without disharmony).

3. Instrumental Music:Musical Expression (ability to perceive and convey the emotional essence of the piece through timbre fluctuations, rhythmic dynamics, and contrast between strong and weak); Innovative Interpretation Style (creative handling of phrases, tempo, and dynamic contrasts while respecting the original work, endowing the piece with a unique charm); Instrument Expressiveness (maximizing the timbre characteristics of the instrument, showing the rich connotation of the work through technical control).

4. Original Music:Creative Uniqueness (novelty of the core creative concept, distinctive melody, harmony, and arrangement design that differ from traditional musical expressions); Integration of Theme and Creativity (alignment between creative expression and core theme, no disjointed creativity and theme or meaningless technical stacking); Style Uniformity (unified overall style of the work, natural transitions between sections, and consistent creativity throughout).

(III) Overall Integrity (20%)

Evaluates the holistic presentation quality and attention to detail of the entry. Specific assessment dimensions by category are as follows:

1. Universal Dimensions:Detail Richness (precision in executing performance nuances, such as breath control in vocal music, ornamentation in instrumental music, and the completeness of phrase endings, avoiding superficial or rough execution); Overall Coordination (uniform adaptation of performance elements like tempo, dynamics, and style; natural transitions between sections without logical gaps); Completion (no significant interruptions, accumulation of errors, or omitted sections during performance; fully showcasing the work's core appeal with a clean ending).

2. Group Music:Team Synergy Integrity (seamless coordination among members, fluent voice part transitions, synchronized rhythm, no timbre conflict, rhythmic dislocation, or sound disconnection, presenting a cohesive and unified whole); Overall Expressiveness (consistent interpretation of the work by the team, synchronized emotional transmission, and joint enhancement of the work's atmosphere).

3. Original Music:Creative Integrity (original content forms a logical loop from beginning to end, free of creative gaps, incomplete structure, or unfinished feeling); Structural Integrity (reasonable musical form structure, coordinated matching of verses, choruses, and interludes, with overall length suitable for performance needs).

(IV) Material Selection and Suitability (10%)

Focuses on the alignment between the performance piece and the contestant's individual abilities, age characteristics, and category style. Specific evaluation dimensions include:

1. Difficulty Suitability:Select pieces with appropriate difficulty based on the contestant's age, years of training, and technical level. For younger age groups, avoid excessive pursuit of high-difficulty techniques that may lead to distorted performances and frequent errors. For older age groups, move beyond simple and repetitive pieces to select repertoire that can showcase technical advancement and musical sense.

2. Strength Highlighting:Whether the selection precisely showcases the contestant's personal strengths, such as clear timbre suitable for folk songs, long breath suitable for lyrical vocal music, and proficient skills suitable for high-difficulty instrumental works, achieving the effect of “using the piece to showcase strengths”.

3. Genre Alignment:The piece's style must align with the characteristics of the selected musical category, avoiding mismatches (e.g., classical instrumental categories suit classical repertoire, pop vocal categories suit pop styles, and ethnic music categories suit repertoire with ethnic characteristics).

II. Judging Mechanism

1. Dual Independent Scoring

Each entry is independently scored by two professional judges specializing in the corresponding musical field. The average score serves as the final result, minimizing subjective bias and ensuring fairness. Should the score difference between the two judges exceed 10 points, a third judge will be engaged for review. The average of all three judges' scores will then constitute the final result.

2. Composition of the Authoritative Judging Panel

The panel comprises senior advisors from the Youth Music Education Association, faculty members from specialized music institutions in vocal music, instrumental music, composition and other corresponding disciplines, heads of teaching and research departments from renowned children's music education institutions, and seasoned practitioners in the music field (such as renowned performers, music producers, vocal instructors, etc.). The panel combines solid academic foundations in music with extensive practical experience in youth music education. They evaluate technical proficiency against professional standards while respecting the innocence and individuality inherent in children's performances, precisely identifying each contestant's musical strengths.