具體參賽流程 / Enrolment and Submission

1. 填寫本頁報名表格並提交，完成參賽資格註冊；

2. 通過 WhatsApp 聯絡我們，獲取賽事最新指引與答疑支持；

3. 截止日期前，將符合要求的參賽視頻通過 WhatsApp 提交，確保作品順利入庫；

4. 關注賽事官方通知管道，耐心等待賽果公佈，屆時將同步公佈獲獎名單及獎項領取方式，見證屬於你的武道榮耀時刻。​

比賽細則 / Entry Details

1. 支持參賽者提交曾在其他比賽中使用過的影片及作品，無需為本次賽事單獨創作；

2. 報名資料一經提交即視為最終版本，不可更改，請務必核實資訊準確性；

3. 參賽者須保證提交的視頻與所報組別（如樂器種類、年齡段等）相符，否則將影響評分資格；

4. 若提交的視頻因格式錯誤、檔損壞等原因無法正常播放，將無法進入評審環節，敬請留意視頻規範；

5. 所有參賽視頻須嚴格依照「影片要求指引」拍攝，確保畫面、音頻及拍攝形式符合標準；

6. 視頻中出現的演奏者必須為參賽者本人，一經發現替演行為，將立即取消參賽資格，以保障賽事公平性。

1. Participants are permitted to submit videos and works that have been used in other competitions; there is no requirement to create new content specifically for this event.  

2. Once submitted, registration information is considered final and cannot be modified. Please ensure the accuracy of all information provided.  

3. Participants must ensure that the submitted video aligns with the category they have entered (e.g., instrument type, age group, etc.). Failure to do so may result in disqualification from the judging process.

4. If submitted videos cannot be played normally due to format errors, file corruption, or other issues, they will not proceed to the judging phase. Please ensure compliance with video specifications;

5. All submitted videos must strictly adhere to the “Video Requirements Guidelines” to ensure that visuals, audio, and filming formats meet standards;

6. Performers appearing in the video must be the participants themselves. Any instances of impersonation will result in immediate disqualification to ensure fairness in the competition.

評分標準 / Judging Criteria

本賽事評分採用 0-100 分制，評審團將從多維度綜合考量參賽者的整體表現，具體評分細則如下：

一、評分細則

1. 技術精度（40%）

核心考察參賽者對跆拳道技術動作的規範性與熟練度：

1. 動作標準度：基礎動作（如站姿、握拳、腿法起收腿）是否符合跆拳道技術規範（如品勢動作的角度、力度節點，腿法的踢擊高度與落點），避免出現「動作變形」「關節發力錯誤」等問題；

2. 節奏把控力：技術銜接的流暢性（如品勢中動作轉換的間隔、腿法組合的連貫性），能否根據項目要求（如慢品勢重規範、快組合重節奏）調整速度，避免「動作間斷」「節奏紊亂」；

3. 細節完整性：技術動作的細節落實（如品勢的眼神配合、腿法的發力順序、防身術的反制合理性），確保動作不僅「形似」，更達到「神似」的技術要求。
    

2. 力量與協調（30%）

聚焦參賽者身體素質與技術的融合呈現：

1. 力量傳達：動作發力的飽滿度（如腿法踢擊的爆發力、拳法出拳的力度），能否通過腰腹核心帶動四肢，避免「發力虛弱」「僅靠手臂 / 腿部單一部位發力」；

2. 身體協調：軀體與四肢的配合度（如踢腿時支撐腿的穩定性、轉身動作的平衡控制），以及動作與呼吸的協調（如發力時呼氣、收勢時吸氣），避免「身體搖晃」「呼吸紊亂影響動作」；

3. 應用合理性：若為實戰 / 防身術項目，技術的實用性（如腿法針對有效部位、防禦動作的及時性），確保技術不僅「好看」，更符合跆拳道項目「實用性」核心。
    

3. 精神與儀態（20%）

衡量參賽者對跆拳道精神的理解與外在呈現：

1. 禮儀規範：賽前後的禮儀落實（如向裁判 / 鏡頭行鞠躬禮、道服的整潔度），體現跆拳道「禮義」精神，避免「無禮儀環節」「道服淩亂」；

2. 精神面貌：參賽過程中的狀態（如眼神專注、神情自信、動作飽含鬥志），避免「精神萎靡」「動作鬆散」，展現青少年的陽光與韌性；

3. 風格契合：能否根據項目特性呈現對應風貌（如傳統品勢的莊重、跆拳道舞的活力、防身術的沉穩），確保精神狀態與技術呈現統一。
    

4. 項目匹配度（10%）

關注參賽內容與參賽者能力的契合性：

1. 難度適配：能否依據自身年齡、段位選擇合適難度的內容（如低年齡段避免挑戰高段位品勢、初學者不盲目嘗試高難度腿法組合），避免「難度過低無法展現實力」或「難度過高導致大量失誤」；

2. 特長發揮：選材能否突出個人優勢（如靈活性強者選技術組合、力量優勢者選實戰項目、節奏感強者選跆拳道舞），達到「以項目揚長」的效果，最大化展現個人武道潛力。
    

二、評審機制

1. 雙重獨立評分：每件參賽視頻由 2 位專業評審分別獨立打分，取兩者平均分作為最終成績，減少主觀偏差，確保評分公平性；

2. 權威評審團構成：評審團成員涵蓋國家級跆拳道裁判、資深跆拳道教練（具備 10 年以上教學經驗）、青少年體育教育專家及跆拳道項目退役運動員，兼具「專業技術判斷力」與「青少年教育視角」，既能以嚴格標準把控技術，也能尊重青少年在訓練階段的成長性，挖掘每位參賽者的潛力與閃光點。

Judging Criteria​

This competition employs a 0-100 point scoring system. The judging panel will comprehensively evaluate contestants' overall performance across multiple dimensions. Specific scoring details are as follows:
I. Scoring Details

1. Technical Precision (40%)

Core assessment of the standardization and proficiency of participants' taekwondo techniques:

1. Movement Standardization: Whether fundamental actions (e.g., stances, fist grips, leg technique initiation/retraction) comply with taekwondo technical standards (e.g., angle and power points in poomsae movements, kicking height and landing points for leg techniques), avoiding issues like “movement distortion” or “incorrect joint power generation”;

2. Rhythm Control: Smooth transitions between techniques (e.g., timing of poomsae transitions, continuity of kicking combinations), ability to adjust speed per event requirements (e.g., slow poomsae prioritizes precision, fast combinations emphasize rhythm), avoiding “disrupted movements” or “irregular rhythm”;

3. Detail Integrity: Implementation of technical nuances (e.g., eye coordination in forms, power sequence in leg techniques, logical countermeasures in self-defense), ensuring movements achieve not just “form” but also “substance” in technical execution.
    

2. Power and Coordination (30%)

Focuses on the integrated presentation of the competitor's physical conditioning and technical skills:

1. Power Transmission: The fullness of power generation in movements (e.g., explosive force in kicking techniques, striking power in punching techniques), demonstrating the ability to drive limbs through core engagement from the waist and abdomen, avoiding “weak power generation” or “power originating solely from isolated arm/leg segments”;

2. Body Coordination: Integration between torso and limbs (e.g., stability of the supporting leg during kicks, balance control during turns), and synchronization between movement and breathing (e.g., exhaling during power generation, inhaling during recovery), avoiding “body swaying” or “disrupted breathing affecting movements”;

3. Applicability: For combat/self-defense events, the practical utility of techniques (e.g., leg strikes targeting effective areas, timely defensive actions), ensuring techniques are not merely “visually appealing” but align with taekwondo's core principle of “practicality.”

3. Spirit and Poise (20%)

Evaluates the competitor's understanding and outward expression of the taekwondo spirit:

1. Etiquette Standards: Implementation of pre- and post-match etiquette (e.g., bowing to referees/cameras, uniform neatness), embodying taekwondo's “courtesy and righteousness” ethos, avoiding “lack of etiquette” or “disheveled uniforms”;

2. Mental Posture: Competitor's state during the event (e.g., focused gaze, confident expression, movements filled with fighting spirit), avoiding “slack posture” or “loose movements,” showcasing youthful vitality and resilience;

3. Style Alignment: Demonstrating appropriate presentation for each event type (e.g., solemnity in traditional poomsae, dynamism in taekwondo dance, composure in self-defense techniques), ensuring unity between mental state and technical execution.

4. Event Suitability (10%)

Focus on the alignment between competition content and the participant's abilities:

1. Appropriate Difficulty: Can the participant select content matching their age and belt rank (e.g., younger age groups avoid challenging high-rank forms, beginners refrain from attempting complex high-difficulty leg techniques), preventing “insufficient difficulty to showcase skill” or “excessive difficulty leading to numerous errors”?

2. Strength Utilization: Does the chosen material highlight individual strengths (e.g., flexible practitioners selecting technical combinations, power-oriented practitioners choosing sparring events, rhythmically gifted practitioners opting for Taekwondo dance)? This achieves the effect of “leveraging events to showcase strengths,” maximizing the display of personal martial potential.
   ​

II. Judging Mechanism

1. Dual Independent Scoring: Each submitted video receives separate scores from two professional judges. The final score is the average of both, minimizing subjective bias and ensuring fairness.

2. Authoritative Panel Composition: Judges include national-level taekwondo referees, senior taekwondo coaches (with over 10 years of teaching experience), youth sports education specialists, and retired taekwondo athletes. This panel combines “technical expertise” with a “youth development perspective,” rigorously evaluating technical proficiency while respecting the developmental nature of youth training. This approach uncovers each participant's potential and unique strengths.