本賽事評分採用0-100分制，評審團將結合華文詩詞的文學特質與創作規律，從格律功底、意境營造、情感真摯度、主題與創新性四個維度綜合考量，確保評審的專業性、權威性與公平性，具體評分細則如下：

一、評分細則

（一）格律功底（40%）

核心考察參賽者對詩詞體裁規範的掌握與運用能力，是詩詞創作的根基所在，具體評估維度包括：​

1. 體式合規性：創作是否符合所選體裁（如律詩、絕句、詞牌、古風等）的基本要求，律詩是否對仗工整、黏對得當，詞是否合平仄、守詞譜，有無體式混淆或不合規範之處；​​

2. 聲韻精准度：韻腳的選用是否統一規範（平水韻、新韻需標注清晰且前後一致），聲調搭配是否抑揚頓挫、富有韻律美，有無出韻、重韻或聲律拗口等問題；​

3. 遣詞煉字：詞語運用的準確性與精煉度，是否避免冗餘直白或生僻晦澀，典故、意象的引用是否貼切自然，能否以凝練文字傳遞豐富內涵；​

4. 句式把控：句式結構是否符合體裁特點，長短節奏是否協調，律詩的頷聯頸聯對仗是否嚴謹而不呆滯，有無句式雜糅或節奏紊亂情況。

 

境營造（30%）

 

聚焦參賽者通過詩詞語言構建文學畫面、傳遞審美意蘊的能力，是作品藝術價值的核心體現，具體評估維度包括：​

1. 意象構建：意象選擇是否鮮明貼切，能否通過具象景物（如山水、花鳥、風雪等）或抽象情思構建完整畫面，意象之間是否關聯緊密、和諧統一；​​

2. 意境層次：作品是否兼具“形”與“神”，能否實現情景交融、虛實相生，意境是否深遠耐品，避免淺嘗輒止或直白說教；​

3. 風格呈現：是否形成鮮明且統一的創作風格（如豪放、婉約、清新、沉鬱等），風格與所選體裁、主題是否適配，展現出獨特的審美追求。
   ​

（三）情感真摯度（20%）

衡量詩詞作品的情感內核與感染力，是詩詞“言志抒情”本質的直接體現，具體評估維度包括：​

1. 情感真實性：情感表達是否發自內心，是否貼合創作者自身經歷或真切感悟，避免無病呻吟、矯揉造作或情感空洞；​

2. 情感適配性：情感基調與主題、意象是否高度契合，悲喜憂樂等情感表達是否自然流暢，有無情感錯位或突兀轉換；​

3. 感染力：能否通過精准的語言與鮮明的意境引發讀者共鳴，使讀者感受到情感的溫度與力量，實現“以詩傳情、以詞達意”的效果。

​​

（四）主題與創新性（10%）

關注作品的思想內涵與創作新意，平衡傳統傳承與時代表達，具體評估維度包括：​

1. 主題價值：主題是否積極健康，是否蘊含對生活、自然、家國、人文的深刻思考，能否傳遞正能量或獨特見解，避免低俗化、功利化表達；​

2. 時代貼合度：能否在傳承古典詩詞精髓的基礎上，融入時代元素與當代視角，使作品既具古典韻味又不失現實意義；​

3. 創新表達：在遵循體裁規範的前提下，是否在句式、意象、情感表達等方面展現創新思維，避免機械模仿或陳詞濫調，形成個性化創作特色。
   ​

二、評審機制​

雙重獨立評分：每件參賽作品由2位專業評審分別獨立打分，取平均分作為初步成績；若兩位評審打分差值超過15分，將提交第三位資深評審複評，最終以三者平均分作為最終成績，最大限度減少主觀偏差，保障評分公平性；

​​​

權威評審團構成：評審團涵蓋高校中文系教授、古典文學研究學者、知名詩人詞人、資深文學期刊編輯及中小學語文教育專家，兼具深厚的學術底蘊、豐富的創作經驗與扎實的教學實踐，既以專業標準評判作品的文學價值，也尊重創作者的個性表達與創新嘗試，精准挖掘每位參賽者的創作潛力與文學閃光點。

​​

Judging Criteria 
Chinese Poetry Creation Competition

This competition adopts a scoring system ranging from 0 to 100 points. The jury will evaluate the entries based on the literary characteristics and creative rules of Chinese poetry, considering four dimensions: metrical proficiency, artistic conception construction, emotional sincerity, and theme & innovation. This comprehensive approach ensures the professionalism, authority, and fairness of the judging. Specific scoring criteria are outlined below:

I. Scoring Criteria

(I) Metrical Proficiency (40%)

This core assessment evaluates the contestant's mastery and application of poetic form standards, which are the foundation of poetry creation. Specific evaluation dimensions include:​

1. Form Compliance: Whether the creation conforms to the basic requirements of the selected genre (such as regulated verse, quatrain, lyric, ancient style, etc.). For regulated verse, whether the antithesis is neat and the tonal agreement is appropriate; for lyrics, whether it conforms to tonal patterns and follows the lyric spectrum; and whether there are any confusion of forms or non-compliance;​

2. Phonological Accuracy: Whether the rhymes are unified and standardized (Pingshui Rhyme and New Rhyme should be clearly marked and consistent throughout), whether the collocation of tones is cadent and full of rhythmic beauty, and whether there are problems such as rhyme deviation, repeated rhymes, or awkward phonology;​

3. Word Choice and Polishing: The accuracy and conciseness of word usage, whether redundant straightforwardness or obscure difficulty is avoided, whether allusions and images are quoted appropriately and naturally, and whether rich connotations can be conveyed with concise words;​

4. Sentence Pattern Control: Whether the sentence structure conforms to the characteristics of the genre, whether the length rhythm is coordinated, whether the antithesis in the second and third couplets of regulated verse is rigorous but not rigid, and whether there are mixed sentence patterns or disordered rhythms.

​​

(II) Artistic Conception Construction (30%)

Focusing on the contestant's ability to construct literary images and convey aesthetic implications through poetic language, which is the core embodiment of the artistic value of the work. Specific evaluation dimensions include:

1. Image Construction: Whether the image selection is vivid and appropriate, whether a complete picture can be constructed through concrete scenery (such as mountains and rivers, flowers and birds, wind and snow, etc.) or abstract feelings, and whether the images are closely connected and harmonious;​​​

2. Artistic Conception Level: Whether the work has both "form" and "spirit", whether it can integrate scenes and emotions, combine virtual and real, and whether the artistic conception is profound and worth savoring, avoiding superficiality or straightforward preaching;​​​

3. Style Presentation: Whether a distinct and unified creative style (such as bold and unconstrained, graceful and restrained, fresh, gloomy, etc.) is formed, whether the style is compatible with the selected genre and theme, and whether it shows a unique aesthetic pursuit.

​​

(III) Emotional Sincerity (20%)

Evaluating the emotional core and appeal of poetic works, which is the direct embodiment of the essence of poetry "expressing aspirations and emotions". Specific evaluation dimensions include:​

1. Emotional Authenticity: Whether the emotional expression comes from the heart, whether it conforms to the creator's own experience or true perception, avoiding affectation, hypocrisy, or empty emotions;​​

2. Emotional Compatibility: Whether the emotional tone is highly consistent with the theme and images, whether the expression of emotions such as joy, sorrow, worry, and pleasure is natural and smooth, and whether there is emotional dislocation or abrupt transition;​​​

3. Appeal: Whether it can arouse the resonance of readers through accurate language and vivid artistic conception, making readers feel the temperature and power of emotions, and realizing the effect of "conveying emotions through poetry and expressing meaning through lyrics".
   ​

(IV) Theme & Innovation (10%)

Focusing on the ideological connotation and creative originality of the work, balancing traditional inheritance and contemporary expression. Specific evaluation dimensions include:​

1. Thematic Value: Whether the theme is positive and healthy, whether it contains profound thoughts on life, nature, family and country, and humanity, whether it can convey positive energy or unique insights, and avoid vulgar and utilitarian expressions;​​​

2. Contemporary Relevance: Whether it can integrate contemporary elements and perspectives on the basis of inheriting the essence of classical poetry, making the work not only have classical charm but also retain practical significance;​​

3. Innovative Expression: On the premise of following the genre norms, whether innovative thinking is demonstrated in sentence patterns, images, emotional expression, etc., avoiding mechanical imitation or clichés, and forming a personalized creative feature.

​​​

II. Judging Mechanism​

Dual Independent Scoring: Each entry will be scored independently by two professional judges, and the average score will be the preliminary result. If the score difference between the two judges exceeds 15 points, the entry will be submitted to a third senior judge for re-evaluation, and the final score will be the average of the three scores. This minimizes subjective bias and ensures scoring fairness;

​​​​

Authoritative Jury Composition: The jury consists of professors from the Chinese Department of universities, scholars of classical literature research, well-known poets and lyricists, senior editors of literary journals, and Chinese language education experts in primary and secondary schools. They have profound academic heritage, rich creative experience, and solid teaching practice. They not only evaluate the literary value of the works based on professional standards but also respect the creators' personal expression and innovative attempts, accurately tapping the creative potential and literary highlights of each contestant